WELCOME TO MY BLOG ::

Selamat Datang Sahabat. Semoga kita menjadi saudara sejati, ketika KLIK anda mengantar masuk space ini semoga bukan ruang hampa yang menjenuhkan. Sangat tersanjung anda berkenaan membaca sejenak apapun yang tersaji disini. Sejurus lalu, meninggalkan komentar, kritik atau pesan bijak buat penghuni blog. Ekspresi anda dalam bentuk tulisan adalah ungkapan abstrak banyak keinginan yang ingin kita gapai. So, berekspresilah dengan tulus dan semangat. Mari kita pupuk semangat dan cita-cita tinggi.
OK

Rabu, 26 Mei 2010

MARINE ALGAL POLYPHENOLICS

Polyphloroglucinol phenolics are the best known example of chemical deterrents against herbivores in temperate marine systems. However, most of the research on these compounds has been done in North America, where phenolic levels in algae are often low. I show here that algae in the Orders Fucales and Laminariales in temperate Australia and New Zealand typically contain very high levels of polyphenolics-much higher than species in these orders in North America. The median value for the distribution of mean phenolic levels for 25 North American species is 1.33% total phenolics (dry wt.); for 37 Australasian species, the median is 6.20%. Significant spatial, temporal, and intraplant variation in phenolic content occurs in a number of species in Australasia, but this does not significantly alter my major conclusion.

Phenolic levels in drift algae (an important food source for some herbivores) detached for up to two weeks are also not significantly different from living, attached plants. Many species in the Fucales in Australasia also contain non-polyphenolic secondary metabolites that are not found in North American species. Thus herbivores in Australasia face greater amounts, and a greater range,of putative chemical defenses in brown algae than do herbivores in similar systems in North America. Any general theory for the evolution of marine plant/herbivore interactions must take into account such broad-scale biogeographical (and taxonomic) patterns.

The diversity and intensity of selection pressure on organisms has been described as varying predictably across biogeographic zones, generally increasing with decreasing latitude. Apparent effects of this increased selective pressure in the tropics include patterns in species diversity (Pianka 1966), diversity and quantity of allelochemicals (Bakus and Green 1974; Levin 1971, 1976; Levin and York 1978; Hay and Fenical 1988; Coley and Aide 1991; Hay and Steinberg in press), predation intensity, inferred antipredatory morphological structures (Vermeij 1978; Jeanne 1979; Bertness et al. 1981; Heck and Wilson 1987) and herbivory (Levin 1976; Lubchenco and Gaines 1981; Gaines and Lubchenco 1982; Steneck 1988; Hay and Steinberg in press). In the marine environment, herbivory is most intense at low latitudes (Vermeij 1978; Lubchenco and Gaines 1981 ; Steneck 1988 ; Hay and Steinberg in press). Algal chemical defenses generally Offprint requests to: N.M.

Targett parallel this latitudinal variation in herbivory with increasing concentration and diversity of allelochemicals with decreasing latitude (Hay and Fenical 1988; Hay and Steinberg in press). Phloroglucinol-based polyphenolics (phlorotannins, see Ragan and Glombitza 1986), antifeedant allelochemicals which occur exclusively in brown algae (Phaeophyta), have been reported as an exception to this trend, increasing in concentration with increasing latitude (Steinberg and Paul 1990; Van Alstyne and Paul 1990; Steinberg et al. 1991 ; Steinberg and Van Altena in press).

This is in contrast to terrestrial data on condensed tannins for broad leaved forest species, which show that temperate species have lower phenolic concentrations than tropical ones (Coley and Aide, 1991 and references therein). In marine temperate regions, where considerable data exist on phlorotannin concentrations, brown algae are characterized as either high or low phenolic species. High phenolic species are defined as those with phenolic concentrations > 2% of their dry weight, the threshold level at which herbivory is typically deterred (Swain 1979; Geiselman and McConnell 1981 ; Steinberg 1988). However, a high degree of inter- and intraspecific variability in phenolic concentration has been observed (Ragan and Glombitza 1986; Steinberg 1986, 1988, 1989).

Phenolic concentrations in tropical phaeophytes have been reported only from Indo-Pacific species; therefore, a less complete picture is available for tropical than for temperate browns (Hay and Fenical 1988; Steinberg and Paul 1990; Van Alstyne and Paul 1990; Steinberg 1986, 1989; Steinberg et al. 1991 ; Steinberg and Van Altena in press). In the Indo-Pacific, phenolic concentrations have been found to be low, although Padina spp. from Magnetic Island, Australia (Steinberg et al. 1991) and individual plants in two other genera (Lobophora and Dictyopteris) were noted as exceptions (Steinberg and Paul 1990). Although brown algal phenolic concentrations have not been determined for any Caribbean species, patterns of herbivore preference have been used to suggest that polyphenolics might be high in some species (Norris and Fenical 1982). We examined phenolic levels in tropical phaeophytes from both the Caribbean and western Pacific and in selected species from the temperate western Atlantic and eastern Pacific (i.e. both coasts of North America). These levels were compared to literature values to determine: 1. Are there latitudinal trends in phenolic concentrations? 2. Are there interoceanic differences between tropical Old World (Indo-Pacific)and Neotropical (Caribbean) phaeophyte phenolic concentrations? 3. Does the magnitude of intraspecific phenolic variability in tropical and temperate phaeophytes overshadow observed latitudinal trends?


Tropical Species
The Caribbean phaeophytes (orders Fucales and Dictyotales) that we examined had phenolic concentration levels ranging from 1.34% to 14.92% dry weight. Caribbean Fucales all had high phenolic concentrations (> 2 %) and tested positive for phloroglucinol derivatives. Two of the four Caribbean Dictyotales examined (Stypopodium zonale and Lobophora variegata in each of its three forms, Coen and Tanner 1989) also had high phenolic concentrations. The dry weight phenolic concentration values for the Lobophora forms and for Stypopodium (8.33% 13.39% and 14.92% respectively) far exceeded all previously reported values for species in this order. Thus, our data from Caribbean phaeophytes in which six of eight species produced phenolic concentrations in excess of 2% (3.37%-14.92%) show that high phlorotannin concentrations are not limited to temperate species. Tropical interocean differences are evident when comparing phenolic concentration values for phaeophyte genera common to the Indo-Pacific and Caribbean. Lobophora variegata, the only species examined in this study that is common to the tropical areas listed, showed low phenolic values for Pacific (0.81%, Hawaii, Table 1) and Indo-Pacific (<2%, p="0.006)," p="0.002)"> 2% dry weight), while species in the orders Laminariales and Dictyotales typically have low levels (Steinberg 1985, 1989; Ragan and Glombitza 1986; Steinberg and Paul 1990; Van Alstyne and Paul 1990; Steinberg et al. 1991 ; Steinberg and Van Altena in press). Earlier studies also show that polyphenolic levels in tropical Fucales and Dictyotales from the Indo-Pacific are low (Steinberg 1986, 1989; Hay and Fenical 1988; Steinberg and Paul 1990; Van Alstyne and Paul 1990; Steinberg et al. 1991). Our results clearly demonstrate that species in the tropics can be high in phenolics. Data from our study and from the literature, where extraction and quantification procedures allow comparisons to be made, also indicate that intraspecific variability may be as high as interspecific variability. Of the phenolic values obtained, most striking were the values obtained for the three forms of Lobophora (Coen and Tanner 1989) and for Stypopodium (8.33-13.39% and 14.92% dry weight respectively). Phloroglucinol and a variety of phenolic acids have been reported from Lobophora variegata (form not specified) collected in Brazil (Legaz et al. 1985). Acetate-derived phenolic lipids have been described from Lobophora papenfussii (Gerwick and Fenical 1982) and their presence in Lobophora variegata (form unspecified) from the Florida Keys has been hypothesized (Paul and Hay 1986). However, higher-molecular-weight phlorotannins are also evident (Folin-Denis test, Lindt test, 1H NMR) in molecular sizing
experiments done on aqueous extracts from each of the three forms of Lobophora collected in Belize (Boettcher and Targett unpublished data). Fresh Stypopodium is known to contain a series of primarily mevalonatederived low-molecular-weight phenolic metabolites (<> 100,000Da (Boettcher and Targett unpublished data).

The absence of a latitudinal phlorotannin trend between Caribbean tropical and temperate phaeophytes and the presence of site-specific phlorotannin variability within species suggests that other factors may play a more critical role within a biogeographic region in determining phenolic concentrations. Variability in phenolic concentration may be influenced by extrinsic factors such as salinity (Ragan and Glombitza 1986), nutrient availability (Ilvessalo and Tuomi 1989), herbivore intensity (Van Alstyne 1988) and season (Ragan and Jensen 1978 ; Ragan and Glombitza 1986). Intrinsic plant factors such as size (Denton et al. 1990), age (Pederson 1984), and tissue type (Steinberg 1984; Tugwell and Branch 1989; Tuomi et al. 1989) may also play a role. The magnitude of the variation in phenolic concentration is often high enough to alter the palatibility of plants to herbivores (Swain 1979; Geiselman and McConnell 1981; Steinberg 1988). Studies regarding the effect of plant phlorotannin concentration on marine tropical herbivores have yielded conflicting results. Van Alstyne and Paul (1990) showed that phlorotannins from temperate species are effective deterrents against some tropical herbivores when they are incorporated into tropical analogues at concentrations > 2% dry wt, while Steinberg et al. (1991) showed that quantitative variability in temperate and tropical algal phenolic levels do not correlate with the susceptibility of these algae to herbivory. These and other studies make supportive arguments based upon the assumption that all tropical phaeophytes are typically low in phenolics and invoke physiological and cost arguments as explanations for their low concentrations (Steinberg 1986; Hay and Fenical 1988; Van Alstyne 1988; Steinberg and Paul 1990; Van Alstyne and Paul 1990; Steinberg et al. 1991; Hay and Steinberg in press; Steinberg and Van Altena in press). Our study shows that phenolics can be present in high and variable concentrations in tropical Caribbean phaeophytes, and thus the assumption that phlorotannins are of little consequence in tropical marine plant-herbivore interactions because of their low concentrations (Steinberg 1986; Hay and Fenical 1988; Van Alstyne 1988; Steinberg and Paul 1990; Van Alstyne and Paul 1990; Steinberg et al. 1991) is premature.

Our results in combination with previously published data suggest that there is an interoceanic difference between phenolic concentrations in tropical Indo-Pacific phaeophytes and Caribbean phaeophytes. Grazing intensity is higher in the Pacific and Indian oceans than in ecologically similar communities in the Atlantic (Vermeij 1978; Estes and Steinberg 1988; Steinberg and Van A1-tena in press). Grazing intensity thus correlates negatively with our observations of phaeophyte phenolic concentrations and calls into question the role of phlorotannins in defense. However, other extrinsic and intrinsic factors may confound the interpretation and should be examined (Bernays et al. 1989). To explain these differences and those in temperate and tropical marine plant-herbivore interactions, it is now evident that more subtle within-plant (Zucker 1983; Gaines 1985; Lewis et al. 1987; Coen and Tanner 1989) and among-herbivore (Gaines 1985; Hay et al. 1987; Horn 1989) characteristics must be examined. These include phenotypic variation in phenolic concentrations, phlorotannin size distributions, induction of phenolics by herbivores, as well as herbivore features such as gut pH and the presence of gut surfactants. Studies such as these will allow a further comparison between the importance of biological/physical factors and geographic distribution in determining phlorotannin concentrations.

Keterangan Gambar :
1. Jenis Alga Laut
2. Struktur Serotonin
3. Spirulina salah satu hasil alga laut


Nb* Dari banyak sumber bacaan.

Read More......

Brown Alga Sargassum asperifolium

Marine organisms have yielded a variety of secondary metabolites that possess novel chemical structures and interesting pharmacological activities (Stonik and Elyalov, 1986). Recently, researchers have described a wide range of biological activities for algal compounds including antibiotic, anti-HIV, anticoagulant, anticonvulsant, anti-inflamnatory, antineoplastic, and antitumor (Ayyad et al., 2002; Lincolon et al., 1991).

A number of diterpenes and sterols have been isolated from the brown algae (Ayyad et al., 2001; Banaigs et al.,1983; Combaut et al., 1980; Enoki et al., 1982; Faulkner et al., 1977; Franciso et al., 1977). In the course of our investigation on the biologically active components of the sargassaceae algae, we report, the isolation and characterization of a new saringosterone (3), a known saringosterol (4), and a known diterpene dictyone (1) from the brown alga Sargassum asperifolium.

Abaout Sargassum

Where seen? The largest of our brown seaweeds, this golden leafy seaweed with strange air bladders is commonly encountered on our Southern shores, but rarely on our Northern shores. It grows on the rocky shores as well as on coral rubble. It appears to be seasonal, sometimes forming a luxuriant golden carpet that covers vast areas of the shore, and washing up on the high tide line in huge heaps. At other times, only short, sparsely bladed specimens are seen, on coral rubble or rocks.

Features: Sargassum is the largest and most plant-like brown seaweed on our shores. The 'stems' grow to about 20cm or longer. Attached to the stems are leaf-shaped blades and inflated air bladders. The 'leaves' may be narrow, broad or very small (1-5cm long). The small round to oval air bladders interspersed among the 'leaves' are often mistaken for fruits. Seaweeds don't produce fruits like seagrasses do. The sargassum's air bladders help the seaweed stay afloat, closer to sunlight. Thus, long pieces often form floating rafts even after they have broken off from their holdfast. Some sargassum species can reproduce by producing new plants from horizontal creeping 'stems'. This is an adaptation to living on slippery rocks at the splash zone of rocky shores.

According to AlgaeBase: there are more than 580 current Sargassum species.

Sargassum forest: Sargassum seaweeds are often covered with other tiny seaweeds growing on or entangled among the blades. In this tangled mess, all kinds of small creatures lurk, hiding from predator or prey, or both.

Human uses: Sargassum seaweeds are eaten by people, and used fish bait in basket traps, animal feed, fertiliser, insect repellent. Various species are used as medicine for ailments ranging from children's fever, cholesterol problems, cleansing the blood, skin ailments.

In the tropics, sargassum seaweeds are a significant source of alginates. They are also used as a component in animal feed and liquid plant food or plant biostimulants. Supplies come from harvested seaweeds, the seaweeds are not farmed.

Detail Of Sargassum asperifolium

Classification:

Empire : Eukaryota
Kingdom : Chromista
Subkingdom : Chromobiota
Infrakingdom : Heterokonta
Phylum : Heterokontophyta
Class : Phaeophyceae
Order : Fucales
Family : Sargassaceae
Genus : Sargassum
Species : Sargassum asperifolium Hering & G. Martens ex J. Agardh

Publication details
Sargassum asperifolium var. dissimile Grunow 1916: 27

Original publication:
Grunow, A. (1916). Additamenta ad cognitionem Sargassorum. Verhandlungen der Kaiserlich-Königlichen Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien 66: 1-48, 136-185.

Type species
The type species (holotype) of the genus Sargassum is Sargassum bacciferum (Turner) C. Agardh.

Status of name
This name is of an entity that is currently accepted taxonomically.

Synonym(s)
No synonyms are currently included in AlgaeBase.

General environment
This is a marine species.

Detailed distribution with sources
(as Sargassum asperifolium var. dissimile Grunow)
Africa: Ethiopia (Papenfuss 1968).

NCBI Nucleotide Sequences
No sequences have been found on the NCBI site.

Nb* dari berbagai sumber bacaan.

Read More......

Investigation of the antifouling constituents from the brown alga Sargassum muticum (Yendo) Fensholt

By. Alexandra Bazes1, 5, *, Alla Silkina1, Philippe Douzenel2, Fabienne Faÿ1, Nelly Kervarec3, Danièle Morin1, Jean-Pascal Berge4 and Nathalie Bourgougnon1

1. Introduction
Engineered structures such as ships and marine platforms, as well as offshore rigs and jetties, are under constant attack from the marine environment. These structures need to be protected from the influences of the key elements of the marine environment such as saltwater, biological attack and temperature fluctuations. The settlement and accumulation of marine organisms on an inanimate substrate can cause large penalties to engineered structures. In heat exchangers, biofouling can clog systems and on ship hulls it can increase the hydrodynamic drag, lower the manoeuvrability of the vessel and increase the fuel consumption. This leads to increased costs within the shipping industry through the increased use of manpower, fuel, material and dry docking time (Abarzua & Jakubowski, 1995, Lambert et al., 2006, Chambers et al., 2006).

The process of biological fouling is often grouped in the literature into key growth stages which include an initial accumulation of adsorbed organics, the settlement and growth of pioneering bacteria creating a biofilm matrix and the subsequent succession of micro and macrofoulers (Wahl, 1989, Abarzua & Jakubowski, 1995, Yebra et al., 2004). Methods for inhibiting both organic and inorganic growth on wetted substrates are varied but most antifouling systems take the form of protective coatings. Unfortunately, operational profiles vary; hence the application of one universal coating to ship hulls is unlikely and specific coatings designed for the particular needs of certain exposure and operational profiles may need to be targeted individually. Heavy metals and booster biocides such as Irgarol 1051 and Diuron are not an environmentally acceptable alternative due to increased concerns over their toxicity, but do offer cost benefits (Chambers et al., 2006). The International Maritime Organisation (IMO) legislation and the increased legislation of local and regional pesticide control authorities are the largest driving forces for the design and implementation of nontoxic antifouling coatings (Chambers et al., 2006).

Biomimetics approach implies the use of the natural world as a model on which to base an engineering development. Marine organisms have been shown to use both physical and chemical methods to protect themselves from biofouling (Bakus et al., 1986, Davis et al., 1989, Wahl, 1989, Steinberg et al., 1998, Fusetani, 2004, Bazes et al., 2006).
The introduced macroalga Sargassum muticum (Yendo) Fensholt (Heterokonta, Fucales) is
found along the coasts of South Brittany (Critchley et al., 1990, Plouguerné et al., 2006). Similar to many other macroalgae, S. muticum may accumulate quantities of secondary metabolites (Hay & Fenical, 1988, Steinberg, 1992, Hay, 1996) generally assumed to be a chemical defence against grazers and bacterial colonisation (Sieburth & Conover, 1965, Hay & Fenical, 1988, Harlin, 1996, Plouguerné et al., 2006). The chemical composition of Sargassum has been studied extensively and phlorotannins (Kubo et al., 1992), phlorethols (Banaimoon, 1992), sterols (Harvey & Kennicutt, 1992) and dicotylpthalate (Sastry & Rao, 1995) have been isolated. Various extracts from this alga have shown biological activities, including bactericidal and fungicidal activities (Sastry & Rao, 1994, 1995, Hellio et al., 2001, Bazes, 2006).
In this paper we report on the isolation and identification of a potential natural antifouling compound from a dichloromethane extract of S. muticum.

2. Material and methods
The brown alga Sargassum muticum (Yendo) Fensholt was harvested in Locmariaquer
(47.55°N-2.90°W, Brittany, France) in March 2004. After collection, the material was rinsed in 3 sterile seawater and 5 % ethanol in order to remove any associated microflora. Algae were then dried at room temperature under shade, and stored in the dark before use. Extraction was performed as previously described by Hellio et al (2001). The dried algae were suspended by stirring in ethanol 95° (2000 g/12 L). After decantation, the resultant pellet was re-extracted five times in the same way. The alcoholic extracts were combined and evaporated under vacuum at low temperature (35°C). Distilled water (4L) was then added and partitioned with dichloromethane (4x4L). The organic phases were collected, left dry in presence of Na2SO4 for 24 h, filtered and concentrated under vacuum at low temperature (dichloromethane extract). The resulting dichloromethane extract (A) was stored at 4°C before use. The extraction yield was 0.85%.

Biocides commonly used in commercial antifouling paints were also evaluated on marine
bacteria, microalgae and macroalgae spores. Diuron, Irgarol 1051, Tolylfluanid and
Dichlofluanid were provided by Nautix, France. Binders and paints. The binder used was purchased from ZENECA. It is a mixture of an acrylic copolymer (polybutylmethacrylate-co-polymethylmethacrylate) with rosin. The relative amount of rosin influences the erosion properties of the final paints. Paints were formulated with this polymer (cf. table I). All the ingredients were dispersed under vigorous agitation (2000rpm) for 1h. Then the paints were filtered through a 100 m sieve.

Immersion and test procedures. Test panels were coated by using an automatic film applicator (Sheen 1137). The wet films were 200m thick. After drying, plates were immersed in the harbour of Lorient (Britanny, France) for two months, July and August, when the fouling pressure is the highest. The plates were immersed under the surface, where most of the fouling organisms live. Purification of the active extract. For each step of purification, the different fractions were tested against three agents of microfouling. The most active fraction was retained for a further purification step. 1.5g of the dichloromethane extract (A) was added to a Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) column (Chromabond SiOH, 150 mL/50 g, Macherey-Nagel) previously conditioned with hexane. Elution was carried out using a gradient of CH2Cl2/MeOH from 99:1 to 0:100 (v/v). The resulting fractions were collected, evaporated and stored at 4 °C before use. The most active fraction (20 mg) was then laid on a preparative pre-coated TLC plate (SIL G-200, Macherey-Nagel) and eluted with CH2Cl2/MeOH 85:15 (v/v). After drying, part of the plate was revealed with sulphuric vanillin (1 g of vanillin in 100 mL of MeOH and 1 mL of concentrated sulphuric acid). Each spot was then scratched, dissolved in CH2Cl2/MeOH 85:15 (v/v), centrifuged and the supernatants were evaporated and stored at 4 °C before use. The active spot was investigated on a HPLC system (Dionex) with a 600E pump and an ASI-100 autosampler injector and UV detection at 215 nm. Separation was performed on an Econosil C18 (Alltech) column (10 mm ID x 250 mm L) heated at 30°C. A multi-step eluting gradient (MeOH/H2O 85:15 0-15 min, MeOH/H2O 100:0 15-30min, MeOH/H2O 85:15 30-40 min) was used at a flow rate of 3 mL.min-1. The volume used for each injection was 500μL. Each peak was collected, evaporated and stored at 4 °C before use. Identification of the active compound

4. Mass spectrometry experiments. An Agilent Technologies 1100 Series vacuum
degasser, LC pump and autosampler (Hewlett-Packard, Germany) were used to analyse the
fraction isolated after C18 HPLC. Twenty microliters of sample solutions were applied onto an analytical C18 reversed-phase column (Hypersil ODS, 250×4.6 mm, particle size 5 μm). The elution procedure consisted of an isocratic profile of methanol–water (15:85, v/v) for 5 min, followed by a linear gradient from 85 to 100% methanol over 15 min, and an isocratic profile with 100% methanol over 20 min. The LC flow (0.4 mL.min-1) was split (1/12) using a microsplitter valve (Upchurch Scientific, USA). The post-column additive, a mixture of 5 mM ammonium acetate and 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) (Analysis grade, Carlo Erba) in methanol–water (50:50, v/v), was added using a Cole-Parmer (USA) syringe pump and a 2.5 mL SGE syringe at a flow-rate 150 μL.h-1. The LC-separated compounds were detected by electrospray ionization ion trap mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) using a Bruker Esquire-LC spectrometer (Bruker Daltonic, Germany) under positive-ion conditions. For each compound, two ions were formed: the [M+H]+ and the [M+Na]+ ions. The [M+H]+ ions were isolated for
MS–MS fragmentation. The MS–MS chromatographic analysis is segmented for the isolation and fragmentation of the eluted [M+H]+ ion. The electrospray used nitrogen as a nebulizing gas (pressure set to 15 p.s.i.) and a drying gas (flow set to 7 mL.min-1). The drying temperature was 300°C. The helium pressure in the ion trap was 6 x 10−6 mbar. Full-scan mode detection was used with a scan range from m/z 50 to 700. The software used was Bruker Esquire-LC NT version 6.08 and Agilent Technologies ChemStation May 1998.

NMR experiments. NMR experiments were performed at 25°C in a Bruker Avance DRX 500 spectrometer equipped with an indirect 5 mm triple TBI 1H/{BB}/13C probehead using standard pulse sequences available in the Bruker software. The samples were dissolved in 700 μL of 99.8% MeOD. 1D 1H spectra were recorded at 500.13Mhz with a 30° pulse, a delay D1 of 2s and 64 scans. Chemical shifts were expressed in ppm relative to TMS (Tetrametylsilane) as external standard. Double-quantum filtered 1H-1H correlated spectroscopy (DQF COSY), Heteronuclear multiple quantum coherence (HMQC), Heteronuclear multiple bond coherence (HMBC) with a 60 ms mixing time were performed according to standard pulse sequences to assign 1H and 13C resonances.

Gas chromatography experiments. Active fraction was evaporated under nitrogen and
methylated by contact with methanol/sulphuric acid (98:2, v/v) in excess for one night at 50°C. After cooling, 2 mL of pentane and 1 mL of water were added and vortexed. The upper organic phase was assayed using GC-MS on a Hewlett-Packard model 6890 series II gas chromatograph attached to an Agilent model 5973N selective quadripole mass detector. GCMS was connected to a computer with Hewlett-Packard chemstation and the ionisation voltage used was 70 eV at 250°C. The temperature of injector and interface were maintained at 250°C and Helium was used as a carrier gas under constant flow (1 mL.min-1). Separation was realised on a CP-Sil 5 CB low bleed MS (Chrompack; 60 m x 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 μm film thickness). The oven temperature was programmed from 80 to 170 °C at a rate of 30 °C/min, then from 170 at 295 °C with a rate of 3 °C.min-1.

Bioassays
Antibacterial activities. The marine bacterial strain was obtained from the Culture Collection of the IUT of Quimper (LUMAQ, UBO, France) and identified by the CIMB (Institut Pasteur, Paris, France) as Rhodobacteraceae bacterium R11 A. This bacterium was associated with immersed surfaces and isolated from decomposing seaweeds (Hellio et al., 2004). Antibacterial evaluation of the extracts and fractions was performed in 96-well plates as previously described in Bazes et al (2006). Samples of cultures grown overnight (2 × 108 cells/mL) were incubated with extracts and biocides (at the concentration of 25, 50, 100, 200 and 300 μg mL− 1) for 48 h at 20 °C (Maréchal et al., 2004). All inhibition assays were carried out in triplicate. Growth was monitored by measuring OD600 with a Packard Spectracount microplate spectrophotometer and the percentage of inhibition was calculated for each concentration:

%inhibition=(ODc−ODc)/ODc×100

where ODc is the mean optical density of the bacterial controls and ODt is the mean optical density of the test samples. Control testing with the solvents and N-decane 1% was performed for every assay and showed no inhibition of the microbial growth. Seawater was used as a negative control.

Inhibition of phytoplankton growth.
Cylindrotheca closterium (Diatomophyceae, AC515) was obtained from the Culture Collection of Algae of the University of Caen (France). It was used as a common fouling species (Jackson, 1991, Hellio et al., 2004). Screening for bioactivity was performed as described by Sawant et al. (1995) and modified in Bazes et al (2006). The effect of algal extracts and fractions (at the concentration of 25, 50, 100, 200 and 300 μg mL− 1) was assessed after 72 h by estimating the chlorophyll-a (Aminot, 1983). All the screening experiments were carried out in triplicate. The percentage of growth inhibition was calculated:

%inhibition=(chlac−chlat)/chlac×100

where chlac is the mean concentration of chlorophyll-a of the algal controls and chlat is the mean concentration of chlorophyll-a of the test samples. Control tests with the solvents and N-decane 1% were performed for every assay and showed no inhibition of the microalgal growth. Seawater was used as a negative control.

Inhibition of germination of Ulva lactuca spores. Ulva lactuca (Ulvales, Chlorophyta) samples were collected in July and September 2004 at Locmariaquer, South Brittany, France (47°33’N, 02°56’W). Spores were obtained using the osmotic method (Fletcher, 1989). Tests of algal extracts and fractions on spores were performed as described by Hattori and Shiruzi (1996) and Bazes et al. (2006), by determining the percentage of inhibition of germination of spores (600/mL) in plastic Petri dishes after incubation for 5 days at 20 °C under 24 h light. All the screening experiments were carried out in triplicate. The percentage of growth inhibition was calculated:

%inhibition=(gsc−gst)/gsc×100

where gsc is the mean number of germinated spores for the controls and gst is the mean number of germinated spores for the test samples. Seawater was used as a negative control.

Toxicity
Cytotoxicity evaluation by cell viability was performed by the neutral red dye method
(McLaren et al., 1983) on 3T3 as described in Bazes et al. (2006). Cellular suspensions (3,5.105 3T3 cells mL− 1 purchased from Eurobio) were incubated with various concentrations of algae extracts and biocides (10–300 μg mL− 1, 4 wells per concentration) in 96-well plates (72 h, 37 °C, 5%CO2) in Eagle's MEM 10% FCS. The same experiment has been conducted with Vero cells. All the cytotoxicity experiments were carried out in triplicate. The cytotoxic concentration (CC50) was expressed by a percentage of destruction:

%destruction=(ODc−ODt)/ODc×100

where ODc is the mean optical density of the cell controls at 540 nm and ODt is the mean optical density of the test samples at 540 nm.

Statistical analysis
Percentage of growth inhibition was calculated for each microfouling organisms as described previously. The 50% effective concentrations (EC50) and cytotoxic concentrations (CC50) were estimated by regression analysis with Prism software, Version 4 (GraphPad Software, Inc.). All calculations were based on measured concentrations of extracts, and CC50 and EC50 were given when it was in the range of concentrations.

3. Results
In situ testing
Results of the in situ tests are shown on Figure 1. No barnacles or mussels were observed on the test rack. The paint including only copper is less efficient than the paints including the crude extract. When copper and crude extract are included together in the paint, there is much less fouling than on the other coatings. 37% of the plate painted with crude extract of S. muticum and copper are covered with young thalli of Ulva sp., while 92% of the plate painted only with S. muticum extract, and 100% of the plate painted only with copper are covered with different green algae (mostly from the genus Ulva), and red algae (mostly from the genus Polysiphonia). Well-developed thalli of Ulva sp. were observed on those last two plates.

Identification of the active compound
Solid Phase Extraction of the crude extract (A) allowed for the isolation of an active fraction in the CH2Cl2/MeOH 70:30 part (B) (91.5mg). The preparative TLC of that sample gave 8 fractions. Fraction no.5 (C) (22.8mg) was active and it was analysed by HPLC on a C18 column using a MeOH/H2O gradient as the eluent. After HPLC, ten fractions were isolated. The eighth one (D) (2.7mg of a pale green oil) was inhibitory to the growth of the three organisms tested. This last fraction was isolated in large quantities for the identification of bioactive molecules. MS on the D fraction showed a peak corresponding to two ions. The m/z 413.4 ion was found in majority while the m/z 391.4 ion was in minority, corresponding to the [M+H]+ and [M+Na]+ ions of the octyl phthalate. MS-MS detection was then used for dentification. The m/z 413.4 ion gave no signal in those conditions, while the m/z 391.4 ion produced a m/z 149 fragment, typically representative of phthalates.

NMR on the D fraction showed that protons from terminal methyl groups show one badly
defined triplet at 0.88 ppm (mainly from 16:0 acyl chains). A multiplet at 1.2 ppm is assigned to the methylene protons. The multiplet at 2.36 ppm corresponds to the CaH2 group and the signal at 1.58 ppm to the CbH2 group (where a and b positions are relative to the carbonyl group). Those signals reveal that this fraction is mostly constituted of lipid chains. The integration and the lack of unsaturated signals at about 5.5 ppm confirm that most of the lipid chains are 16:0 (palmitic acid). The HMQC spectrum allowed the specific assignment of 1J carbons and HMBC sequencing determined the shift of the carbonyl group. To confirm to the results obtained by NMR, and determine the abundance of fatty acids, GC-MS analyses were performed on every sample.

The fatty acid content of every sample is shown in Table 2. The crude extract contains 99% fatty acids and 1% contaminant. This table highlights that the different steps used during the purification process led to the loss of most of the fatty acids present in the crude extract, the only main one remaining in the D fraction. The analysis of fraction D confirmed the results obtained with NMR. As it was not possible to separate the two main compounds from the D fraction, palmitic acid and dioctyl phthalate were purchased from Sigma and were investigated separately for their antifouling activity in order to determine the role of each in the activity of the fraction

Antifouling activities of the different isolated fractions.
The antifouling activities of the crude extract, the HPLC purified fraction, the palmitic acid and dioctyl phthalate (Sigma) and commercial biocides were evaluated and are presented in Table 3. The remaining active fraction after the HPLC step (D) contains at least 70% palmitic acid and shows a better activity on every fouling organism tested than the four chemical biocides. Moreover, this fraction showed no toxicity on 3T3 cells. Palmitic acid purchased from Sigma was also tested for its antifouling activities and showed good antibacterial activity against R. bacterium R11A with an EC50 at 44μg.mL-1. Besides this antibacterial activity, palmitic acid also inhibits the development of a microalgal strain (C. closterium) at 45.5μg.mL-1 and the germination of spores from U. lactuca at 3μg.mL-1. Myristic (14:0) or stearic (18:0) acids were also tested on fouling organisms and none of them showed antifouling activity (data not shown).

Those results also show that palmitic acid has a better antibacterial activity than dioctyl phthalate while the dioctyl phthalate is inactive at concentrations up to 300μg.mL-1. However, the comparison of the activity of those two products on C. closterium shows that the dioctyl phthalate is more efficient than the palmitic acid with an EC50 lower than 25μg.mL-1. This EC50 is the same as for the crude extract. This suggests a synergetic effect between the dioctyl phthalate and the palmitic acid on the growth of C. closterium. The biocides tested here showed a low antibacterial activity. Diuron and Dichlofluanid showed an inhibition of Rhodobacteraceae bacterium R11 A at less than 200μg mL− 1, while Tolylfluanid showed no bacterial inhibition under 300μg mL− 1. Conversely, they all showed a good microalgal inhibition under 25μg mL− 1. Irgarol, Tolylfluanid and dichlofluanid showed less inhibition of the germination of the spores than the extracts and purified fractions, while Diuron was active at 25μg mL−1. The four biocides tested here showed high toxicity against 3T3 cells with a CC50 under 32μg mL−1, while no cytotoxicity was observed at oncentration lower than 300μg.mL-1 for the crude extract and purified fractions.

4. Discussion
In 2000, a study on the antifouling activity of extracts from 30 marine algae has been conduced (Hellio, 2000). Statistical analysis of this study allowed the isolation promising potential antifouling of extracts from the brown seaweed Sargassum muticum. This study was confirmed and completed by the work of Hellio et al. (2004), and the study from Bazes (2006) showed that the most efficient extract was produced from S. muticum harvested in March. The chemical composition of Sargassum has been studied extensively but the present investigation was undertaken considering that there is no report regarding antifouling activity of purified compounds derived from S. muticum.Palmitic acid is a common fatty acid in brown algae and in the genus Sargassum it can represent 20 to 40% of the total fatty acids (Vaskovsky et al., 1996, Li et al., 2002, Hossain et al., 2003, Kornprobst, 2005). In S. muticum it was shown to constitute 21.5% of the total fatty acids (Vaskovsky et al., 1996). Fatty acids can be produced from triglycerides by action of lipases and have to be included in chemical ecology studies (Noguchi et al., 1979). The fats and fatty acids from marine organisms can play an important role due to the wide diversity of their biological characteristics and their oxidative enzymes leading to the formation of many other bioactive secondary metabolites (Ganti et al., 2006). Indeed, some fatty acids have shown antibacterial or bacteriostatic activities (C8-C12), while C4-C12 fatty acids have antifungal activities and C7-C12 fatty acids inhibit the growth of Chlorella sp (Noguchi et al., 1979). Active antibacterial extracts from different brown algae (Alaria marginata, Desmarestia ligulata, Dictyota pfaffii, Egregia menziesii, Eisenia arborea, Fucus distichus, Laminaria saccharina, Macrocystis integrifolia, Nereocystis luetkeana and Pleurophycus gardneri) have been found to be made up of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids, with a predominance of myristic, palmitic, oleic, arachidonic and eicosapentaenoic acids (Rosell & Srivastava, 1987, Barbosa et al., 2007). A mixture of fatty acids from a lipophilic fraction from Skeletonema costatum, has also shown an interesting level of inhibition on the growth of Vibrio anguillarum and other pathogens associated with the aquaculture industry (Naviner et al., 1999). Hexadecyl palmitate isolated from the alcyonacean soft coral Sinularia polydactyla was also shown to be active against Vibrio harveyi (Risk et al., 1997). The sulphoglycerolipid 1-O-palmitoyl-3-O(6′-sulpho-α-quinovopyranosyl)-glycerol isolated from the methanolic extract of the brown seaweed Sargassum wightii is active against Xanthomonas oryzae. This compound is mainly formed from palmitic acid (Arunkumar et al., 2005).

A method developed to control biofouling using polyglycol fatty ester has shown that pure palmitic acid may be used to inhibit bacteria from adhering to a submergible surface (Glover et al., 1997). Those studies confirm the biological activity of palmitic acid observed in our work. The type and amount of free fatty acids can then have a role in the overall defence against microbial colonisation (Benkendorff et al., 2005), but we have shown here that a fatty acid can have an effect on other microfouling organisms. However, we have also highlighted the presence of the 1,2 benzenedicarboxylic acid, bis(2-ethylhexyl) ester (or dioctyl phthalate; di-(2-ethylhexyl)-phthalate or DEHP), which is a plasticizer and constitutes 16% of the active fraction of S. muticum. Pthalate esters are likely contaminants from plastics in the laboratory encountered during the extraction or isolation process and are commonly found during natural products isolation. However, phthalate ester may also come from the coastal environment and/or reflect a phenomenon of bioaccumulation (Peakall, 1975). Phthalate esters have been found in soils, plants, and aquatic organisms (Morris, 1970, Peakall, 1975, Melancon & Lech, 1976, Noguchi et al., 1979, Wofford et al., 1981, Stales et al., 1997, Chen, 2004, Mackintosh et al., 2004, Cho et al., 2005). Because of their lipophilicity, they can be potentially bioaccumulated by organisms (Mackintosh et al., 2004). The biosynthesis of di-(2-ethylhexyl)-phthalate has been studied by Chen (2004), who has shown that the red alga Bangia atropurpurea was synthesising this compound de novo. In algae, di-(2-ethylhexyl)-phthalate has been isolated from Ceramium rubrum, but the origin of this phthalate had not been elucidated (Noguchi et al., 1979). Dioctyl
phthalate has also been isolated from the brown algae S. wightii (Sastry & Rao, 1995), Ishige okamurae (Cho et al., 2005) and S. confusum (Ganti et al., 2006). The dioctyl phthalate isolated from S. wightii has shown antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Proteus vulgaris, E. coli, Salmonella typhi, S. paratyphi A, S. typhiridium and Pseudomonasaeruginosa (Sastry & Rao, 1995). This phthalate was isolated in a lipid fraction, not unlike in our study. The other extracts of algae studied by those authors and harvested at the same place did not show any antibacterial activity (Sastry & Rao, 1994) which suggested that the antibacterial compound of interest did not come from the environment. Di-n-octylphthalate (DNOP) has been isolated from Ishige okamurae and tested against the mussel Mytilus edulis and the green alga U. prolifera (Cho et al., 2005). Total repulsion of the fussel feet was induced by 0.3mM of DNOP, and 1mM of DNOP showed a reduction of 7.5% in spore fixation compared to a seawater control. Dioctyl phthalate also has been isolated from S.confusum and tested on spore attachment of U. pertusa (Ganti et al., 2006). Concentrations of 1 to 100 μg.mL-1 inhibited 53 to 86% of spore attachment.

The role of the phthalate ester in the active fraction of S. muticum does not seem to be
important, except against the growth of the phytoplanktonic strain, but it would be interesting to determine its origin.

In conclusion, fatty acid esters can then play an important role in the defence and protection against bacterial development, providing that they can be present in sufficient quantities on the considered surface (Benkendorff et al., 2005). The relevant literature leads us to believe that palmitic acid could be responsible for the antifouling activity observed in the active fraction isolated from S. muticum. Two patents (Glover et al., 1997, Risk et al., 1997) already showed the potential of pure palmitic acid as an antibacterial compound which could be used 9 in wood protection (Risk et al., 1997), or of one of its derivate, hexadecyl palmitate, which could inhibit bacterial colonisation of a submersed surface (Glover et al., 1997). The tests conducted with commercial palmitic acid on representative organisms of primary colonisation, show good activity at low concentrations. Moreover, no toxicity was observed on the cell models used. This compound has potential for the development of an environmentally friendly antifouling product. Furthermore, it can be easily purchased, so there is no need to carry out expensive and time-consuming extractions from S. muticum. New assays in paints for commercial palmitic acid and D fraction are currently under development to compare their activity in vivo.

References
Abarzua S., Jakubowski S (1995). Biotechnological investigation for the prevention of
biofouling: I. Biological and biochemical principles for the prevention of biofouling. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 123: 301-312
Arunkumar K., Narayanan Selvapalam N., Rengasamy R. (2005). The antibacterial
compound sulphoglycerolipid 1-0 palmitoyl-3-0(6'-sulpho-alpha-quinovopyranosyl)-glycerol from Sargassum wightii Greville (Phaeophyceae) Bot. Mar. 48 (5): 441-445
Bakus G.J., Targett N.M. & Schulte B. (1986). Chemical ecology of marine organisms: an overview. J. Chem. Ecol. 12 (5): 951-987
Banaimoon S.A. (1992) Fatty acids in marine macroalgae from southern Yemen (Hadarmout) including occurrence of eicosatetraenoic (20:4) and eicosapentaenoic (20:5) acids. Bot. Mar. 35: 165–168.
Barbosa, J. P., Fleury B. G., da Gama B. A. P., Teixeira V.L., Pereira R.C. (2007). Natural products as antifoulants in the Brazilian brown alga Dictyota pfaffii (Phaeophyta, Dictyotales). Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 35 (8): 549-553.
Bazes A. (2006) Recherche et valorisation de principes actifs antifouling isolés à partir de trois macroalgues. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Bretagne-Sud.
Bazes A., Silkina A., Defer D., Bernède-Bauduin C., Quéméner E., Braud J-P., Bourgougnon N. (2006) Active substances from Ceramium botryocarpum used as antifouling products in aquaculture. Aquaculture 258 (1-4): 664-674
Benkendorff K., Davis A.R., Rogers C.N., Bremner J.B. (2005) Free fatty acids and sterols in the benthic spawn of aquatic molluscs, and their associated antimicrobial properties. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 316 (1): 29-44
Chambers L.D., Stokes K.R., Walsh F.C., Wood R.J.K. (2006) Modern approaches to marine antifouling coatings. Surf. Coat. Tech. 201 (6): 3642-3652
Chen C.Y. (2004) Biosynthesis of di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) and di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP) from red alga Bangia atropurpurea. Water Res. 38(4):1014-1018.
Cho J-Y, Choi J-S, Kang S-E, Kim J-K, Shin H-W, Hong Y-K . (2005) Isolation of antifouling active pyroglutamic acid, triethyl citrate and di-n-octylphthalate from the brown seaweed Ishige okamurae. J. Appl. Phycol. 17: 431-435
Critchley A.T., Farnham W.F., Yoshida T., Norton T.A. (1990) A bibliography of the invasive alga Sargassum muticum (Yendo) Fensholt (Fucales, Sargassaceae). Bot. Mar. 33: 551-562
Davis A.R., Targett N.M., Mc Connel O.J., Young C.M. (1989) Epibiosis of marine algae and benthic invertebrates : natural products chemistry and other mecanisms inhibiting settlement and overgrowth.In: Scheuer P.J., Editor, Bioorg. Mar. Chem. 3, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 85-114
Fletcher R.L. (1989) A bioassay technique using the marine fouling green alga Enteromorpha. Int. biodeterior. 25: 407-422
Fusetani N. (2004) Biofouling and antifouling. Natural Product Reports 21: 94–104
Ganti V.S., Kim K.H., Bhattarai H.D., Shin H.W. (2006) Isolation and characterisation of some antifouling agents from the brown alga Sargassum confusum. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 2006, 8(4): 309-315
Glover D.E., Whittemore M.S., Bryant S.D. (1997) Methods and compositions for controlling biofouling using polyglycol fatty acid esters. International Patent Application WO 97/11912
Harlin M. (1996) Allelochemistry in marine algae. Crit. Rev. Plant. Sci. 5(3): 237-249
Harvey H.R., Kennicutt M.C. (1992) Selective alteration of Sargassum lipids in anoxic
sediments of the Orca basin. Org. Geochem. 18 (2):181-187
Hattori T., Shizuri Y. (1996) A screening method for antifouling substances using spores of the fouling macroalga Ulva conglobata Kjellman. Biofouling 8: 147-160
Hay M.E., Fenical W (1988) Marine Plant-Herbivore Interactions: The Ecology of Chemical Defense. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19: 111-145
Hay M.E. (1996). Marine chemical ecology : what’s known and what’s next? J. Exp. Mar.
Biol. Ecol. 200: 103-134
Hellio C. (2000) Recherche de nouvelles substances à activité antifouling à partir de
macroalgues du Littoral Breton. Thèse de Doctorat Sciences de la Vie, Université de La Rochelle.
Hellio C., De La Broise D., Dufossé L., Le Gal Y., Bourgougnon N. (2001) Inhibition of marine bacteria by extracts of macroalgae: potential use for environmentally friendly antifouling paints. Mar. Environ. Res. 52: 231-247
Hellio C., Marechal J-P., Véron B., Bremer A.G., Clare A.S., Le Gal Y. (2004) Seasonal variation of antifouling activities of marine algae from the Brittany coast (France). Mar. biotechnol. 6(1): 67-82
Hossain Z., Kurihara H., Takahashi K. (2003) Biochemical composition and lipid compositional properties of the brown alga Sargassum horneri. Pakistan J. Biol. Sci. 6(17): 1497-1500
Jackson S.M. (1991) Microalgae: Their status as fouling organisms. Oebalia 17 (1): 295-303 Kornprobst J-M. Substances naturelles d’origine marine, Tome 1 : Généralités, microorganismes, algues. Tec & Doc, Paris, 2005.
Kubo I., Himejima M., Tsujmoto K., Muroi H., Ichikawa N. (1992) Antibacterial activity of crinitol and its potentiation. J. Nat. Products 55 (6):780–785.
Lambert S.J., Thomas K.V., Davy A.J. (2006) Assessment of the risk posed by the antifouling booster biocides Irgarol 1051 and diuron to freshwater macrophytes. Chemosphere 63(5): 734-743
Li X., Fan X., Han L., Lou Q. (2002) Fatty acids of some algae from the Bohai Sea.
Phytochemistry 59(2): 157-61
Mackintosh C.E., Maldonado J., Hongwu J., Hoover N, Chong A, Ikonomou MG, Gobas FA.
(2004) Distribution of phthalate esters in a marine aquatic food web: comparison to
polychlorinated biphenyls. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38(7): 2011-20
McLaren C., Ellis M. N., Hunter G. A. (1983) A colorimetric assay or the measurement of the sensitivity of Herpes simplex viruses to antiviral agents. Antivir. Res. 3: 223-234
Melancon M.J. Jr, Lech J.J. (1976) Distribution and biliary excretion products of di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate in rainbow trout. Drug Metab. Dispos. 4(2): 112-118
Morris RJ. (1970) Phthalic acid in deep sea jellyfish Atolla. Nature 227: 1264
Naviner M., Bergé J-P., Durand P., Le Bris H. (1999) Antibacterial activity of the marine diatom Skeletonema costatum against aquacultural pathogens. Aquaculture, 174: 15-24
Noguchi T., Ikawa M., Uebel J.J., Andersen K.K. (1979) Lipid constituents of the red algae Ceramium rubrum. A search for antimicrobial and chemical defense substances. In: Hoppa HA, Levring T., Tanaka Y., editors. Marine algae in pharmaceutical science. New York: Walter de Gruyter & co, pp. 711-718
Peakall DB. (1975) Phthalate esters: Occurence and biological effects. Residue Rev. 54: 1-41
Phillips D. (1977) The use of biological indicator organisms to monitor trace metal pollution in marine and estuarine environments-a review. Environ Pollut. 13 (4): 281-317
Plouguerne, E., Le Lann K., Connan S., Jechoux G., Deslandes E., Stiger-Pouvreau V.
(2006). Spatial and seasonal variation in density, reproductive status, length and phenolic content of the invasive brown macroalga Sargassum muticum (Yendo) Fensholt along the coast of Western Brittany (France). Aquat. Bot. 85 (4):337-346.
Risk M., Harrison P., Lewis J. (1997) Wood preserving composition. International Patent Application WO 97/34747
Rosell K, Srivastava L. (1987) Fatty acids as antimicrobial substances in brown algae. Hydrobiologia 151-152 (1): 471-475
Sastry V.M.V.S, Rao G.R.K. (1994) Antibacterial substances from marine algae : successive extraction using benzene, chloroform and methanol. Bot. Mar. 37 (4): 357-360
Sastry V.M.V.S, Rao G.R.K. (1995) Dioctyl phthalate and antibacterial compound from
marine brown alga Sargassum wightii. J. Appl. Phycol. 7: 185-186
Sawant, S.S., Sonak, S., Garg, A. (1995) Growth inhibition of fouling bacteria and diatoms by extract of terrestrial plant, Derris scandens (Dicotyledonae:Leguminocae). Indian J. Mar. Sci. 24 (4): 229-230
Sawidis T., Brown M.T., Zachariadis G., Sratis I.. (2001) Trace metal concentrations in marine macroalgae from different biotopes in the Aegean Sea. Environ Int. 27: 43-47
Sieburth, J.M, Conover J.T. (1965) Sargassum tannin, an anti-biotic which retards fouling. Nature 208: 52-53
Stales C.A., Peterson D.R., Parkerton T.F., Adams W.J. (1997) The environmental fate of phthalate esters: a literature review. Chemosphere 35(4): 667-749
Steinberg P.D. (1992) Geographical variation in the interaction between marine herbivores and brown algal secondary metabolites. In: V.J. Paul, Editor, Ecological Roles of Marine Natural Products, Cornell University Press, Ithaca pp. 51–92.
Steinberg P.D., de Nys, R., Kjelleberg, S. (1998) Chemical inhibition of epibiota by Australian seaweeds. Biofouling 12: 227-244
Subramonia Thangam T., Kathiresan K. (1991) Mosquito larvicidal effect of seaweed
extracts. Bot. Mar. 34 (5): 433–435.
Vaskovsky, V.E., Khotimchenko, S.V., Xia, B., Hefang L. (1996) Polar lipids and fatty acids of some marine macrophytes from the Yellow Sea. Phytochemistry 42: 1347-1356
Wahl M. (1989) Marine epibiosis : I. Fouling and antifouling : some basic aspects. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 58: 175-189
Wahl M., Kröger K., Lenz M. (1998) Non-toxic protection against epibiosis. Biofouling 12 (1-3): 205-226
Wofford H.W., Wilsey C.D., Neff G.S., et al. (1981) Bioaccumulation and metabolism of
phthalate esters by oysters, brown shrimp and sheepshead. Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 5(2): 202-210
Yebra D.M., Kiil S., Dam-Johansen K. (2004) Antifouling technology- past, present and future step towards efficient and environmentally friendly antifouling coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 50: 75-104

Source :
Journal of Applied Phycology August 2009, Volume 21, Number 4, Pages 395-403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10811-008-9382-9
© 2009 Springer. Part of Springer Science+Business Media
The original publication is available at http://www.springerlink.com

Read More......

Kamis, 04 Februari 2010

PHAGOCYTOSIS


Phagocytosis is the cellular process of Phagocytes and Protists of engulfing solid particles by the cell membrane to form an internal phagosome, which is a food vacuole, or pteroid. Phagocytosis is a specific form of endocytosis involving the vesicular internalization of solid particles, such as bacteria, and is therefore distinct from other forms of endocytosis such as pinocytosis, the vesicular internalization of various liquids. Phagocytosis is involved in the acquisition of nutrients for some cells, and in the immune system it is a major mechanism used to remove pathogens and cell debris. Bacteria, dead tissue cells, and small mineral particles are all examples of objects that may be phagocytosed.

The process is only homologous to eating at the level of single-celled organisms; in multicellular animals, the process has been adapted to eliminate debris and pathogens, as opposed to taking in fuel for cellular processes, except in the case of the Trichoplax

1. In immune system
Phagocytosis in mammalian immune cells is activated by attachment to Pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPS), which leads to NF-κB activation. Opsonins such as C3b and antibodies can act as attachment sites and aid phagocytosis of pathogens.[1]
Engulfment of material is facilitated by the actin-myosin contractile system. The phagosome of ingested material is then fused with the lysosome, leading to degradation

Degradation can be oxygen-dependent or oxygen-independent.
• Oxygen-dependent degradation depends on NADPH and the production of reactive oxygen species. Hydrogen peroxide and myeloperoxidase activate a halogenating system which leads to the destruction of bacteria.
• Oxygen-independent degradation depends on the release of granules, containing proteolytic enzymes such as defensins, lysozyme and cationic proteins. Other antimicrobial peptides are present in these granules, including lactoferrin which sequesters iron to provide unfavourable growth conditions for bacteria.

It is possible for cells other than dedicated phagocytes (such as dendritic cells) to engage in phagocytosis.[2]

2. In Apoptosis
Following apoptosis, the dying cells need to be taken up into the surrounding tissues by macrophages in a process called Efferocytosis. One of the features of an apoptotic cell is the presentation of a variety of intracellular molecules on the cell surface, such as Calreticulin, Phosphatidylserine (From the inner layer of the plasma membrane), Annexin A1 and oxidised LDL. These molecules are recognised by receptors on the cell surface of the macrophage such as the Phosphatidylserine Receptor, or by soluble (free floating) receptors such as Thrombospondin 1, Gas-6 and MFG-E8, which then themselves bind to other receptors on the macrophage such as CD36 and Alpha-V Beta-3 Integrin.

2. In protists
In many protists, phagocytosis is used as a means of feeding, providing part or all of their nourishment. This is called phagotrophic nutrition, as distinguished from osmotrophic nutrition, which takes place by absorption.
• In some, such as amoeba, phagocytosis takes place by surrounding the target object with pseudopods, as in animal phagocytes. In humans, Entamoeba histolytica can phagocytose red blood cells.[3] This process is known as "erythrophagocystosis", and is considered the only reliable way to distinguish Entamoeba histolytica from noninvasive species such as Entamoeba dispar.[4]
• Ciliates also engage in phagocytosis.[5] In ciliates there is a specialized groove or chamber in the cell where phagocytosis takes place, called the cytostome or mouth.
The resulting phagosome may be merged with lysosomes containing digestive enzymes, forming a phagolysosome. The food particles will then be digested, and the released nutrients are diffused or transported into the cytosol for use in other metabolic processes.

Mixotrophy can involve phagotrophic nutrition and phototrophic nutrition.[6]

CELL (BIOLOGY)

often called the building bricks of life.[1] Some organisms, such as most bacteria, are unicellular (consist of a single cell). Other organisms, such as humans, are multicellular. (Humans have an estimated 100 trillion or 1014 cells; a typical cell size is 10 µm; a typical cell mass is 1 nanogram.) The largest known cell is an unfertilized ostrich egg cell.[2]

In 1835 before the final cell theory was developed, a Czech Jan Evangelista Purkyně observed small "granules" while looking at the plant tissue through a microscope. The cell theory, first developed in 1839 by Matthias Jakob Schleiden and Theodor Schwann, states that all organisms are composed of one or more cells. All cells come from preexisting cells. Vital functions of an organism occur within cells, and all cells contain the hereditary information necessary for regulating cell functions and for transmitting information to the next generation of cells.[3]
The word cell comes from the Latin cellula, meaning, a small room. The descriptive name for the smallest living biological structure was chosen by Robert Hooke in a book he published in 1665 when he compared the cork cells he saw through his microscope to the small rooms monks lived in.[4]

General Principles
Each cell is at least somewhat self-contained and self-maintaining: it can take in nutrients, convert these nutrients into energy, carry out specialized functions, and reproduce as necessary. Each cell stores its own set of instructions for carrying out each of these activities.

All cells have several different abilities:[5]
• Reproduction by cell division: (binary fission/mitosis or meiosis).
• Use of enzymes and other proteins coded for by DNA genes and made via messenger RNA intermediates and ribosomes.
• Metabolism, including taking in raw materials, building cell components, converting energy, molecules and releasing by-products. The functioning of a cell depends upon its ability to extract and use chemical energy stored in organic molecules. This energy is released and then used in metabolic pathways.
• Response to external and internal stimuli such as changes in temperature, pH or levels of nutrients.
• Cell contents are contained within a cell surface membrane that is made from a lipid bilayer with proteins embedded in it.
Some prokaryotic cells contain important internal membrane-bound compartments,[6] but eukaryotic cells have a specialized set of internal membrane compartments.

Anatomy of cells
There are two types of cells: eukaryotic and prokaryotic. Prokaryotic cells are usually independent, while eukaryotic cells are often found in multicellular organisms.

Prokaryotic cells
eukaryotes. There are two kinds of prokaryotes: bacteria and archaea; these share a similar overall structure.

A prokaryotic cell has three architectural regions:
• on the outside, flagella and pili project from the cell's surface. These are structures (not present in all prokaryotes) made of proteins that facilitate movement and communication between cells;
• enclosing the cell is the cell envelope - generally consisting of a cell wall covering a plasma membrane though some bacteria also have a further covering layer called a capsule. The envelope gives rigidity to the cell and separates the interior of the cell from its environment, serving as a protective filter. Though most prokaryotes have a cell wall, there are exceptions such as Mycoplasma (bacteria) and Thermoplasma (archaea)). The cell wall consists of peptidoglycan in bacteria, and acts as an additional barrier against exterior forces. It also prevents the cell from expanding and finally bursting (cytolysis) from osmotic pressure against a hypotonic environment. Some eukaryote cells (in plants and fungi) also have a cell wall;
• inside the cell is the cytoplasmic region that contains the cell genome (DNA) and ribosomes and various sorts of inclusions. A prokaryotic chromosome is usually a circular molecule (an exception is that of the bacterium Borrelia burgdorferi, which causes Lyme disease). Though not forming a nucleus, the DNA is condensed in a nucleoid. Prokaryotes can carry extrachromosomal DNA elements called plasmids, which are usually circular. Plasmids enable additional functions, such as antibiotic resistance.

Eukaryotic cells
Eukaryotic cells are about 10 times the size of a typical prokaryote and can be as much as 1000 times greater in volume. The major difference between prokaryotes and eukaryotes is that eukaryotic cells contain membrane-bound compartments in which specific metabolic activities take place. Most important among these is the presence of a cell nucleus, a membrane-delineated compartment that houses the eukaryotic cell's DNA. It is this nucleus that gives the eukaryote its name, which means "true nucleus." Other differences include:
• The plasma membrane resembles that of prokaryotes in function, with minor differences in the setup. Cell walls may or may not be present.
• The eukaryotic DNA is organized in one or more linear molecules, called chromosomes, which are associated with histone proteins. All chromosomal DNA is stored in the cell nucleus, separated from the cytoplasm by a membrane. Some eukaryotic organelles such as mitochondria also contain some DNA.
• Eukaryotes can move using cilia or flagella. The flagella are more complex than those of prokaryotes.

PHAGOCYTES

Phagocytes are the white blood cells that protect the body by ingesting (phagocytosing) harmful foreign particles, bacteria and dead or dying cells. They are essential for fighting infections, and for subsequent immunity.[1] Phagocytes are important throughout the animal kingdom,[2] and are highly developed in vertebrates.[3] One liter of human blood contains about six billion phagocytes.[4] Their name comes from the Greek phagein, 'to eat or devour', and kutos, 'hollow vessel'.[5] Phagocytes were first discovered in 1882 by Ilya Ilyich Mechnikov while he was studying starfish larvae.[6] Mechnikov was awarded the 1908 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his discovery.[7] Phagocytes occur in many species; some amoebae behave like macrophages which suggests that phagocytes appeared early in the evolution of life.[8]

Phagocytes of humans and other animals are called professional or non-professional, depending on how effective they are at phagocytosis.[9] The professional phagocytes include cells called neutrophils, monocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells, and mast cells.[10] The main difference between professional and non-professional phagocytes is that the professional phagocytes have molecules called receptors on their surfaces that can detect harmful objects, such as bacteria, that are not normally found in the body.[11] Phagocytes are therefore crucial in fighting infections, as well as in maintaining healthy tissues by removing dead and dying cells that have reached the end of their life-span.[12]

During an infection, chemical signals attract phagocytes to places where the pathogen has invaded the body. These chemicals may come from bacteria, or from other phagocytes already present. The phagocytes move by a method called chemotaxis. When bacteria touch a phagocyte, they bind to the receptors on the phagocyte's surface and are consumed.[13] When a pathogen enters some phagocytes, this can trigger a chemical attack by the phagocytes that uses oxidants and nitric oxide to kill the pathogen.[14] After phagocytosis, macrophages and dendritic cells can also participate in antigen presentation: this is when the phagocyte moves parts of the ingested material back to its surface. This material is then displayed to other cells of the immune system. Some phagocytes then travel to the body's lymph nodes and display the material to white blood cells called lymphocytes. This process is important in building immunity.[15] However, many pathogens have evolved methods to counter attacks by phagocytes.[1]

History
The Russian zoologist Ilya Ilyich Mechnikov (1845–1916) first recognized that specialized cells were involved in defense against microbial infections. In 1882, he studied motile (freely moving) cells in the larvae of starfishes, believing they were important to the animals' immune defenses. To test his idea, he inserted small thorns from a tangerine tree into the larvae. After a few hours he noticed that the motile cells had surrounded the thorns.[16] Mechnikov traveled to Vienna and shared his ideas with Carl Friedrich Claus who suggested the name ‘‘phagocyte’’ (from the Greek words phagein, meaning 'to eat or devour', and kutos, meaning 'hollow vessel'[5]) for the cells that Mechnikov had observed.[17]
A year later, Mechnikov studied a fresh-water crustacean called Daphnia, a tiny transparent animal that can be examined directly under a microscope. He discovered that fungal spores that attacked the animal were destroyed by phagocytes. He went on to extend his observations to the white blood cells of mammals and discovered that the bacterium Bacillus anthracis could be engulfed and killed by phagocytes, a process that he called phagocytosis.[18] Mechnikov proposed that phagocytes were a primary defense against invading organisms.

In 1903, Amroth Wright discovered that phagocytosis was reinforced by specific antibodies which he called opsonins, from the Greek "opson", a dressing or relish.[19] Mechnikov was awarded (jointly with Paul Ehrlich) the 1908 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his work on phagocytes and phagocytosis.[7]
Although the importance of these discoveries slowly gained acceptance during the early twentieth century, the intricate relationships between phagocytes and all the other components of the immune system were not known until the 1980s.[20]

Phagocytosis
Phagocytosis is the process of taking in particles such as bacteria, parasites, dead host cells and cellular and foreign debris by a cell.[21] It involves a chain of molecular processes.[22] Phagocytosis occurs after the foreign body, a bacterial cell for example, has bound to molecules called "receptors" that are on the surface of the phagocyte. Then the phagocyte stretches itself around the bacterium and engulfs it. Phagocytosis of bacteria by human neutrophils takes on average nine minutes.[23] Once inside this phagocyte, the bacterium is trapped in a compartment called a phagosome. Within one minute the phagosome merges with either a lysosome or a granule to form a phagolysosome. The imprisoned bacterium is then submitted to a formidable battery of killing mechanisms,[24] and is dead a few minutes later.[23] Dendritic cells and macrophages are not so fast and phagocytosis can take many hours in these cells. Macrophages are slow and untidy eaters but they engulf huge quantities of material and frequently release some undigested back into the tissues. This debris serves as a signal to recruit more phagocytes from the blood.[25] Phagocytes will eat almost anything; scientists have fed macrophages with iron filings and then used a small magnet to separate them from other cells in a mixture.[26]

A phagocyte has many types of receptors on its surface that are used to bind material.[1] They include opsonin receptors, scavenger receptors, and Toll-like receptors. Opsonin receptors increase the phagocytosis of bacteria that have been coated with complement or IgG antibodies. Complement is the name given to a complex series of protein molecules found in the blood that destroy or mark cells for destruction.[27] Scavenger receptors bind to a large range of molecules on the surface of bacterial cells, and Toll-like receptors—so called because of their similarity to well-studied receptors in fruit flies that are encoded by the Toll gene—bind to more specific molecules. Binding to Toll-like receptors increases phagocytosis and causes the phagocyte to release a group of hormones that cause inflammation.[1]

Methods of killing
The killing of microbes is a critical function of phagocytes,[28] and is either performed within the phagocyte (intracellular killing) or outside of the phagocyte (extracellular killing).

Oxygen-dependent intracellular killing
When a phagocyte ingests bacteria (or any material), its oxygen consumption increases. The increase in oxygen consumption is called a respiratory burst, which produces reactive oxygen-containing molecules that are anti-microbial.[29] The oxygen compounds are toxic to both the invader and the cell itself, so they are kept in compartments inside the cell. This method of killing invading microbes by using the reactive oxygen-containing molecules is referred to as oxygen-dependent intracellular killing, of which there are two types.[14]

The first type is the oxygen-dependent production of a superoxide,[1] which is an important, oxygen-rich, bacteria-killing substance.[30] The superoxide is converted to hydrogen peroxide and singlet oxygen by an enzyme called superoxide dismutase. Superoxides also react with the hydrogen peroxide to produce hydroxyl radicals which assist in killing the invading microbe.[1]
The second type involves the use of the enzyme myeloperoxidase from neutrophil granules.[31] When granules fuse with a phagosome, myeloperoxidase is released into the phagolysosome and this enzyme uses hydrogen peroxide and chlorine to create hypochlorite, a substance used in domestic bleach. Hypochlorite is extremely toxic to bacteria.[1] Myeloperoxidase contains a heme pigment, which makes secretions rich in neutrophils, such as pus and infected sputum, green.[32]

Oxygen-independent intracellular killing
Phagocytes can also kill microbes by oxygen-independent methods, but these are not as effective as the oxygen-dependent ones. There are four main types: The first uses electrically charged proteins which damage the bacterium's membrane. The second type uses lysozymes; these enzymes break down the bacterial cell wall. The third type uses lactoferrins which are present in neutrophil granules and remove essential iron from bacteria.[33] The fourth type uses proteases and hydrolytic enzymes; these enzymes are used to digest the proteins of destroyed bacteria.[34]
Gambar 4. Micrograph of Gram-stained pus showing Neisseria gonorrhoeae bacteria inside phagocytes and their relative sizes

Intracellular : In cell biology, molecular biology and related fields, the word intracellular means "inside the cell".
It is used in contrast to extracellular (outside the cell). The cell membrane (and, in plants, the cell wall) is the barrier between the two, and chemical composition of intra- and extracellular milieu can be radically different. In most organisms, for example, a Na+/K+ ATPase maintains a high potassium level inside cells while keeping sodium low, leading to chemical excitability.

Extracellular killing
Interferon-gamma—which was once called macrophage activating factor—stimulates macrophages to produce nitric oxide. The source of interferon-gamma can be CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, Natural Killer cells, B cells, Natural Killer T cells, monocytes, macrophages, or dendritic cells.[35] Nitric oxide is then released from the macrophage and, because of its toxicity, kills microbes near the macrophage.[1] Activated macrophages produce and secrete tumor necrosis factor. This cytokine—a class of signaling molecules[36]—kills cancer cells and cells infected by viruses, and helps to activate the other cells of the immune system.[37]
In some diseases, e.g. the rare chronic granulomatous disease, the efficiency of phagocytes is impaired and recurrent bacterial infections are a problem.[38] In this disease there is an abnormality affecting different elements of oxygen-dependent killing. Other rare congenital abnormalities, such as Chediak-Higashi Syndrome, are also associated with defective killing of ingested microbes.[39]

Extracellular : In cell biology, molecular biology and related fields, the word extracellular (or sometimes extracellular space) means "outside the cell". This space is usually taken to be outside the plasma membranes, and occupied by fluid. The term is used in contrast to intracellular (inside the cell).
The composition of the extracellular space includes metabolites, ions, proteins, and many other substances that might affect cellular function. For example, hormones act by travelling the extracellular space towards biochemical receptors on cells. Other proteins that are active outside the cell are the digestive enzymes.
The term 'extracellular' is often used in reference to the extracellular fluid (ECF) which composes about 15 litres of the average human body. The cell membrane (and, in plants and fungi, the cell wall) is the barrier between the two, and chemical composition of intra- and extracellular milieu can be radically different. In most organisms, for example, a Na+/K+-ATPase pump maintains a high concentration of sodium ions outside cells while keeping that of potassium low, leading to chemical excitability. Many cold-tolerant plants force water into the extracellular space when the temperature drops below 0 degrees Celsius, so that when it freezes, it does not lyse the plants' cells. [1]

Two compartments comprise the extracellular space: the vascular space and the interstitial space.[2]

Viruses
Viruses can only reproduce inside cells and they gain entry by using many of the receptors involved in immunity. Once inside the cell, viruses use the cell's biological machinery to their own advantage—forcing the cell to make hundreds of identical copies of themselves. Although phagocytes and other components of the innate immune system can, to a limited extent, control viruses, once they are inside cells the adaptive immune responses, particularly the lymphocytes, are more important for defense.[40] At the sites of viral infections, lymphocytes often vastly outnumber all the other cells of the immune system; this is common in viral meningitis.[41] Virus infected cells that have been killed by lymphocytes are cleared from the body by phagocytes.[42]

Role in apoptosis
Animals' cells constantly die and are replaced by cell division. In adults, the number of cells is kept relatively constant. Cells are usually replaced when they malfunction or become diseased, but cell proliferation must be offset by cell death.[12] There are two different ways a cell can die: by necrosis or by apoptosis. In contrast to necrosis, which often results from disease or trauma, apoptosis—or programmed cell death—is a normal healthy function of cells. The body has to rid itself of millions of dead or dying cells every day and phagocytes play a crucial role in this process.[43]

Dying cells that undergo the final stages of apoptosis[44] display molecules, such as phosphatidylserine, on their cell surface to attract phagocytes.[45] Phosphatidylserine is normally found on the cytosolic surface of the plasma membrane, but is redistributed during apoptosis to the extracellular surface by a hypothetical protein known as scramblase.[46] These molecules mark the cell for phagocytosis by cells that possess the appropriate receptors, such as macrophages.[47] The removal of dying cells by phagocytes occurs in an orderly manner without eliciting an inflammatory response and is an important function of phagocytes.[48]
Gambar 5. Apoptosis—phagocytes clear fragments of dead cells from the body

Interactions with other cells
Phagocytes are not bound to any particular organ but move through the body, interacting with the other phagocytic and non-phagocytic cells of the immune system. They can communicate with other cells by producing chemicals called cytokines, which recruit other phagocytes to the site of infections or stimulate dormant lymphocytes.[49] Phagocytes form part of the innate immune system which animals, including humans, are born with. Innate immunity is very effective but non-specific in that it does not discriminate between different sorts of invaders. On the other hand, the adaptive immune system of jawed vertebrates—the basis of acquired immunity—is highly specialized and can protect against almost any type of invader.[50] The adaptive immune system is dependent on lymphocytes, which are not phagocytes, but produce protective proteins called antibodies which tag invaders for destruction and prevent viruses from infecting cells.[51] Phagocytes, in particular dendritic cells and macrophages, stimulate lymphocytes to produce antibodies by an important process called antigen presentation.[52]

Antigen presentation
Antigen presentation is a process in which some phagocytes move parts of engulfed materials back to the surface of their cells and "present" them to other cells of the immune system.[53] There are two "professional" antigen-presenting cells: macrophages and dendritic cells.[54] After engulfment, foreign proteins (the antigens) are broken down into peptides inside dendritic cells and macrophages. These peptides are then bound to the cell's major histocompatibility complex (MHC) glycoproteins, which carry the peptides back to the phagocytes surface where they can be "presented" to lymphocytes.[15] Mature macrophages do not travel far from the site of infection, but dendritic cells can reach the body's lymph nodes where there are millions of lymphocytes.[55] This enhances immunity because the lymphocytes respond to the antigens presented by the dendritic cells just as they would at the site of the original infection.[56] But dendritic cells do not always co-operate with lymphocytes and will destroy them if necessary to protect the body. This is seen in a process called tolerance.[57]

Immunological tolerance
Dendritic cells also promote immunological tolerance,[58] which stops the body attacking itself. The first type of tolerance is central tolerance: when T cells first depart from the thymus, dendritic cells destroy the T cells that carry antigens that would cause the immune system to attack itself. The second type of immunological tolerance is peripheral tolerance. Some T cells that possess antigens that would cause them to attack "self" slip through the first process of tolerance, some T cells develop self-attacking antigens later in life, and some self-attacking antigens are not found in the thymus; because of this dendritic cells will work, again, to restrain the activities of self-attacking T cells outside of the thymus. Dendritic cells can do this by destroying them or by recruiting the help of regulatory T cells to inactivate the harmful T cells' activities.[59] When immunological tolerance fails, autoimmune diseases can follow.[60] On the other hand, too much tolerance allows some infections, like HIV, to go unnoticed.[59]

Professional phagocytes
Phagocytes of humans and other jawed vertebrates are divided into "professional" and "non-professional" groups based on the efficiency with which they participate in phagocytosis.[9] The professional phagocytes are the monocytes, macrophages, neutrophils, tissue dendritic cells and mast cells.[10] One liter of human blood contains about six billion phagocytes.[4]
Gambar 7. Phagocytes derive from stem cells in the bone marrow

Activation
All phagocytes, and especially macrophages, exist in degrees of readiness. Macrophages are usually relatively dormant in the tissues and proliferate slowly. In this semi-resting state they clear away dead host cells and other non-infectious debris and rarely take part in antigen presentation. But during an infection they receive chemical signals—usually interferon gamma—which increases their production of MHC II molecules and which prepares them for presenting antigens. In this state, macrophages are good antigen presenters and killers. However, if they receive a signal directly from an invader they become "hyperactivated", stop proliferating and concentrate on killing. Their size and rate of phagocytosis increases—some become large enough to engulf invading protozoa.[61]
In the blood, neutrophils are inactive but are swept along at high speed. When they receive signals from macrophages at the sites of inflammation, they slow down and leave the blood. In the tissues they are activated by cytokines and arrive at the battle scene ready to kill.[62]

Migration
When an infection occurs, a chemical "SOS" signal is given off to attract phagocytes to the site.[63] These chemical signals may include proteins from invading bacteria, clotting system peptides, complement products, and cytokines that have been given off by macrophages located in the tissue near the infection site.[1] Another group of chemical attractants are cytokines which recruit neutrophils and monocytes from the blood.[13]

To reach the site of infection, phagocytes leave the blood stream and enter the affected tissues. Signals from the infection cause the endothelial cells that line the blood vessels to make a protein called selectin which neutrophils stick to on passing by. Other signals called vasodilators loosen the junctions connecting endothelial cells, allowing the phagocytes to pass through the wall. Chemotaxis is the process by which phagocytes follow the cytokine "scent" to the infected spot.[1] Neutrophils travel across epithelial cell-lined organs to sites of infection and although this is an important component of fighting infection, the migration itself can result in disease-like symptoms.[64] During an infection millions of neutrophils are recruited from the blood but they die after a few days.[65]

Monocytes
Monocytes develop in the bone marrow and reach maturity in the blood. Mature monocytes have large, smooth, lobed nuclei and abundant cytoplasm that contains granules. Monocytes ingest foreign or dangerous substances and present antigens to other cells of the immune system. Monocytes form two groups: a circulating group and a marginal group which remain in other tissues (approximately 70% are in the marginal group). Most monocytes leave the blood stream after 20–40 hours to travel to tissues and organs, and in doing so transform into macrophages[66] or dendritic cells depending on the signals they receive.[67] There are about 500 million monocytes in one liter of human blood.[4]

magnification
Macrophages
Mature macrophages do not travel far but stand guard over those areas of the body that are exposed to the outside world. There they act as garbage collectors, antigen presenting cells, or ferocious killers depending on the signals they receive.[68] They derive from monocytes, granulocyte stem cells, or the cell division of pre-existing macrophages.[69] Human macrophages are about 21 micrometers in diameter.[70]
This type of phagocyte does not have granules but contains many lysosomes. Macrophages are found throughout the body in almost all tissues and organs (e.g., microglial cells in the brain and alveolar macrophages in the lungs) where they silently lie in wait. A macrophage's location can determine its size and appearance. Macrophages cause inflammation through the production of interleukin-1, interleukin-6, and TNF-alpha.[71] Macrophages are usually only found in tissue and are rarely seen in blood circulation. The life-span of tissue macrophages has been estimated to range from four to fifteen days.[72]

Macrophages can be activated to perform functions that a resting monocyte cannot.[71] T helper cells (also known as effector T cells or Th cells), a sub-group of lymphocytes, are responsible for the activation of macrophages. Th1 cells activate macrophages by signaling with IFN-gamma and displaying the protein CD40 ligand.[73] Other signals include TNF-alpha and lipopolysaccharides from bacteria.[71] Th1 cells can recruit other phagocytes to the site of the infection in several ways. They secrete cytokines that act on the bone marrow to stimulate the production of monocytes and neutrophils and they secrete some of the cytokines and that are responsible for the migration of monocytes and neutrophils out of the blood stream.[74] Th1 cells come from the differentiation of CD4 T cells once they have responded to antigen in the secondary lymphoid tissues.[71] Activated macrophages play a potent role in tumor destruction by producing TNF-alpha, IFN-gamma, nitric oxide, reactive oxygen compounds, cationic proteins, and hydrolytic enzymes.[71]
Gambar 10. Pus oozing from an abscess caused by bacteria—pus contains millions of phagocytes

Neutrophils
Neutrophils are normally found in the bloodstream and are the most abundant type of phagocyte, constituting 50% to 60% of the total circulating white blood cells.[75] One liter of human blood contains about five billion neutrophils,[4] which are about 10 micrometers in diameter,[76] and live for only about five days.[37] Once they have received the appropriate signals, it takes them about thirty minutes to leave the blood and reach the site of an infection.[77] They are ferocious eaters and rapidly engulf invaders coated with antibodies and complement, and damaged cells or cellular debris. Neutrophils do not return to the blood; they turn into pus cells and die.[77] Mature neutrophils are smaller than monocytes, and have a segmented nucleus with several sections; each section is connected by chromatin filaments—neutrophils can have 2–5 segments. Neutrophils do not normally exit the bone marrow until maturity but during an infection neutrophil precursors called myelocytes and promyelocytes are released.[78]

The intra-cellular granules of the human neutrophil have long been recognized for their protein-destroying and bactericidal properties.[79] Neutrophils can secrete products that stimulate monocytes and macrophages. Neutrophil secretions increase phagocytosis and the formation of reactive oxygen compounds involved in intracellular killing.[80] Secretions from the primary granules of neutrophils stimulate the phagocytosis of IgG antibody-coated bacteria.[81]
Gambar 11. A neutrophil with a segmented nucleus (center and surrounded by erythrocytes), the intra-cellular granules are visible in the cytoplasm (Giemsa stained high magnification)

Dendritic cells
Dendritic cells are specialized antigen-presenting cells that have long outgrowths called dendrites,[82] which help to engulf microbes and other invaders.[83][84] Dendritic cells are present in the tissues that are in contact with the external environment; mainly the skin, the inner lining of the nose, lungs, stomach and intestines.[85] Once activated, they mature and migrate to the lymphoid tissues where they interact with T cells and B cells to initiate and orchestrate the adaptive immune response.[86] Mature dendritic cells activate T helper cells and cytotoxic T cells.[87] The activated helper T cells interact with macrophages and B cells to activate them in turn. In addition, dendritic cells can influence the type of immune response produced; when they travel to the lymphoid areas where T cells are held they can activate T cells which then differentiate into killer T cells or helper T cells.[88]

Mast cells
Mast cells have Toll-like receptors and interact with dendritic cells, B cells, and T cells, to help mediate adaptive immune functions. Mast cells express MHC class II molecules and can participate in antigen presentation; however, the mast cell's role in antigen presentation is not very well understood.[89] Mast cells can consume and kill gram-negative bacteria (e.g., salmonella), and process their antigens.[90] They specialize in processing the fimbrial proteins on the surface of bacteria, which are involved in adhesion to tissues.[91][92] In addition to these functions, mast cells produce cytokines that induce an inflammatory response.[93] This is a vital part of the destruction of microbes because they attract more phagocytes to the site of infection.[90]

Non-professional phagocytes
Dying cells and foreign organisms are consumed by cells other than the "professional" phagocytes.[95] These cells include epithelial cells, endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and mesenchymal cells. They are called non-professional phagocytes, to emphasize that, in contrast to professional phagocytes, phagocytosis is not their principal function.[96] Fibroblasts, for example, only make ineffective attempts to ingest foreign particles.[97]

Non-professional phagocytes are more limited limited than professional phagocytes in the type of particles they can take up. This is due to their lack of efficient phagocytic receptors, particularly opsonins—which are antibodies and complement attached to invaders by the immune system.[11] Additionally, most nonprofessional phagocytes do not produce reactive oxygen-containing molecules in response to phagocytosis.[98]

Pathogen evasion and resistance
A pathogen is only successful in infecting an organism if it can get past its defenses. Pathogenic bacteria and protozoa have developed a variety of methods to resist attacks by phagocytes and many actually survive and replicate within phagocytic cells.[99][100]

Avoiding contact
There are several ways bacteria avoid contact with phagocytes. First, they can grow in sites that phagocytes are not capable of traveling to (e.g., the surface of unbroken skin). Second, bacteria can suppress the inflammatory response; without this response to infection phagocytes cannot respond adequately. Third, some species of bacteria can inhibit the ability of phagocytes to travel to the site of infection by interfering with chemotaxis.[99] Fourth, some bacteria can avoid contact with phagocytes by tricking the immune system into "thinking" that the bacteria are "self". Treponema pallidum—the bacterium that causes syphilis—hides from phagocytes by coating its surface with fibronectin,[101] which is produced naturally by the body and plays a crucial role in wound healing.[102]

Avoiding engulfment
Bacteria often produce proteins or sugars that coat their cells and interfere with phagocytosis; these are called capsules.[99] An example is the K5 capsule and O75 O antigen found on the surface of Escherichia coli,[103] and the exopolysaccharide capsules of Staphylococcus epidermidis.[104] Streptococcus pneumoniae produces several types of capsule which provide different levels of protection,[105] and group A streptococci produce proteins such as M protein and fimbrial proteins to block engulfment. Some proteins hinder opsonin-related ingestion; Staphylococcus aureus produces Protein A to block antibody receptors which decreases the effectiveness of opsonins.[106]

Survival inside the phagocyte
Bacteria have developed ways to survive inside phagocytes, where they continue to evade the immune system.[107] To get safely inside the phagocyte they express proteins called "invasins". When inside the cell they remain in the cytoplasm and avoid toxic chemicals contained in the phagolysosomes.[108] Some bacteria prevent the fusion of a phagosome and lysosome, to form the phagolysosome.[99] Other pathogens, such as Leishmania, create a highly-modified vacuole inside the phagocyte, which helps them persist and replicate.[109] Legionella pneumophila produces secretions which cause the phagosome to fuse with vesicles other than the ones that contain toxic substances.[110] Other bacteria are capable of living inside of the phagolysosome. Staphylococcus aureus, for example, produces the enzymes catalase and superoxide dismutase which break down chemicals—such as hydrogen peroxide—produced by phagocytes to kill bacteria.[111] Bacteria may escape from the phagosome before the formation of the phagolysosome: Listeria monocytogenes can make a hole in the phagosome wall using a enzymes called listeriolysin O and phospholipase C.[112]

Killing
Bacteria have developed several ways of killing phagocytes.[106] These include: cytolysins which form pores in the phagocyte's cell membranes; streptolysins and leukocidins which cause neutrophils' granules to rupture and release toxic substances,[113][114] and exotoxins which reduce the supply of a phagocyte's ATP, needed for phagocytosis. After a bacterium is ingested it may kill the phagocyte by releasing toxins that travel through the phagosome or phagolysosome membrane to target other parts of the cell.[99]

Disruption of cell signaling
Some survival strategies often involve disrupting cytokines and other methods of cell signaling to prevent the phagocyte's responding to invasion.[115] The protozoan parasites Toxoplasma gondii, Trypanosoma cruzi and Leishmania infect macrophages and each has unique ways of taming them. Some species of Leishmania alter the infected macrophage's signalling and repress the production of cytokines and microbicidal molecules—nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species—and compromise antigen presentation.[116]

Host damage by phagocytes
Macrophages and neutrophils, in particular, play a central role in the inflammatory process, by releasing proteins and small-molecule inflammatory mediators that both control infection and can damage host tissue. In general phagocytes aim to destroy pathogens by engulfing them and subjecting them to battery of toxic chemicals inside a phagolysosome. If a phagocyte fails to engulf it's target, these toxic agents can be released into the environment (an action referred to as "frustrated phagocytosis"). As these agents are also toxic to host cells they can cause extensive damage to healthy cells and tissues.[97]
When neutrophils release their granule contents in the kidney, the contents of the granule (reactive oxygen compounds and proteases) degrade the extracellular matrix of host cells and can cause damage to glomerular cells, affecting their ability to filter blood and causing changes in shape. In addition, phospholipase products (e.g., leukotrienes) intensify the damage. This release of substances promotes chemotaxis of more neutrophils to the site of infection and glomerular cells can be damaged further by the adhesion molecules during the migration of neutrophils. The injury done to the glomerular cells can cause renal failure.[117]
Neutrophils also play a key role in the development of most forms of acute lung injury (ALI).[118] In ALI, activated neutrophils release the contents of their toxic granules into the lung environment.[119] Experiments have shown that a reduction in the number of neutrophils lessens the effects of ALI,[120] but treatment by inhibiting neutrophils is not clinically realistic, as it would leave the host vulnerable to infection.[119] Damage by neutrophils can contribute to liver dysfunction and injury in response to the release of endotoxins produced by bacteria, sepsis, trauma, alcoholic hepatitis, ischemia, and hypovolemic shock resulting from acute hemorrhage.[121]
Chemicals released by macrophages can also damage host tissue. TNF-α is an important chemical that is released by macrophages that causes the blood in small vessels to clot to prevent an infection from spreading.[122] However, if a bacterial infection spreads to the blood, TNF-α is released into vital organs which can cause vasodilation and a decrease in plasma volume; these in turn can be followed by septic shock. During septic shock, TNF-α release causes a blockage of the small vessels that supply blood to the vital organs, and the organs may fail. Septic shock can lead to death.[13]

Evolutionary origins
Phagocytosis is common and probably appeared early in evolution,[123] evolving first in unicellular eukaryotes.[124] Amoebae, are unicellular protists that separated from the tree leading to metazoa shortly after the divergence of plants, but they share many specific functions with mammalian phagocytic cells. [124] Dictyostelium discoideum, for example, is an amoeba that lives in the soil and feeds on bacteria. Like animal phagocytes, it engulfs bacteria by phagocytosis mainly through Toll-like receptors and has other biological functions in common with macrophages.[125] Dictyostelium discoideum is social and aggregates when starved to form a migrating slug. This multicellular organism eventually produces a fruiting body with spores that are resistant to environmental dangers. Before the formation of fruiting bodies, the cells can migrate as slug-like organisms for several days. During this time, exposure to toxins or bacterial pathogens have the potential to compromise survival of the amoebae by limiting spore production. Some of the amoebae engulf bacteria and absorb toxins while circulating within the slug and these amoebae eventually die. They are genetically identical to the other amoebae in the slug and their sacrificing themselves to protect the other amoebae from bacteria is similar to the self-sacrifice by the phagocytes seen in the immune system of higher organisms. This innate immune function in social amoebae suggests an ancient cellular foraging mechanism that may have been adapted to defense functions well before the diversification of the animals.[126] But a common ancestry with mammalian phagocytes has not been proven. Phagocytes occur throughout the animal kingdom,[2] from marine sponges to insects and lower and higher vertebrates.[127][128] The ability of amoebae to distinguish between self and non-self is a pivotal one which is the root of the immune system of many species.[8]

NB. From Any Soerce Refference

Read More......

SAHABAT MAYA :

SEARCH LINK :

Label List

VISIT TOROWAMBA BEAUTY BEACH

VISIT TOROWAMBA BEAUTY BEACH
torowamba as one of tourism asset in sape bima

NEW MOTIVATION :

SUNGGUH SANGAT MEMALUKAN JIKA KAPAL BESAR KITA BERBALIK HALUAN KEBELAKANG HANYA UNTUK MENGURUS SAMPAN KECIL MASALAH. AYO !!! MAJU TERUS BRO !
Template by KangNoval & Abdul Munir | blog Blogger Templates